Choose Granite Countertops Near Me Marshfield, MA for Elegance and Durability

MARSHFIELD - August 26 - Six days before Marshfield voters decide a $7 million operational override, the Town and its school district have signed a Memorandum of Understanding that locks in a school funding formula, imposes new financial reporting deadlines, and commits both boards to seek no additional operational override for at least five years if the September 1 question passes. The agreement, announced in a joint press release on August 26, was approved by the Select Board on August 17 by a 2-1 vote and by the School Committee unanimously on August 18.

The MOU is a policy agreement among the parties: the Town of Marshfield, acting through its Select Board and Town Administrator; the Marshfield School Committee; and the Superintendent of Marshfield Public Schools. It does not appropriate money, amend the Town Charter, or bind Town Meeting to any future vote. What it does is convert a set of practices that had been handled informally, or not at all, into written commitments with dates attached.

“This agreement is intended to change the way we approach municipal finances,” said Rick Smith, Chair of the Marshfield Select Board, in the release. “Fiscal discipline requires more than balancing a budget each year. It means planning further ahead, identifying financial pressures earlier, formalizing a plan to find operational efficiencies and cost savings, and improving the result through collaboration and partnership.”

The most consequential provision for voters weighing Tuesday’s ballot question is Section 9, the “No New Operational Override Pledge.” If the $7,000,000 override passes, the parties pledge to Marshfield residents that they will not seek an additional operational override for at least five years. The pledge carries two written exceptions: it does not apply if the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers applicable to Plymouth County rises by more than 15 percent during any consecutive 36-month period, or if state or federal aid falls more than 15 percent below what Marshfield received in Fiscal Year 2027. Both boards may vote to extend the pledge for another five years.

The agreement’s second major provision sets a revenue-sharing formula. Marshfield Public Schools would be allocated 68.5 percent of total revenue after shared costs are subtracted. The MOU enumerates those shared costs at length: overlay, debt-excluded debt service, cherry sheet assessments and offsets, South Shore Vocational Technical assessments, Norfolk Agricultural, payroll processing fees, the benefits coordinator, Munis, accounts payable, audits, tax titles, the reserve fund, facilities, snow and ice, non-excluded debt service, debt issuance costs, general insurance, Medicare, pension obligations, employee health insurance, and unemployment.

According to the press release, the 68.5 percent figure “is consistent with historical spending by Marshfield Public Schools,” and the framework mirrors approaches used in other Massachusetts communities, including neighboring Scituate.

The MOU also divides free cash by origin. Money that becomes available because of school-side revenue or savings goes to the schools; money generated elsewhere does not. The document offers two examples: if prior-year Chapter 70 aid exceeds the original budgeted amount, schools receive 100 percent of that surplus; if free cash results from lower-than-budgeted spending on a non-school expense, the schools receive none of it.

“Public education reflects the values of our community, and if we hope to continue to meaningfully and responsibly invest in our schools, we need some level of financial predictability,” said Sean Costello, Chair of the Marshfield School Committee. “This agreement is a great reflection of how successful partnership can help move our community forward. It gives Marshfield Public Schools reliability in financial planning, and ensures we have a framework to avoid uncertainty.”

Superintendent Dr. Patrick Sullivan said the agreement “will increase fiscal responsibility, ensure financial oversight, and create predictability in revenue and free cash sharing,” adding that the district would “do our part to abide by this agreement.”

The remainder of the MOU builds a calendar. The Town Administrator must produce a two-year revenue and expense report and forecast three times annually, on or before September 30, December 31, and March 30, with each posted to the Town website and presented to the Select Board. A five-year revenue, expense, and capital forecast must be published on or about September 30 each year and presented at a joint meeting of the Select Board, School Committee, Advisory Board, and, pending a separate agreement, the Board of Public Works, held between September 30 and October 15.

Departments must submit five-year capital forecasts to the Capital Budget Committee by August 31, and the committee must publish those requests within two weeks. The Town Administrator’s proposed budget is due to the Select Board by January 15, with the budget and supporting documents to the Advisory Board by the last Monday in January and final revisions completed by the end of February. A separate joint budget presentation must occur on or before February 28. The Town Administrator must also give a summary report on the Town’s fiscal health at a Select Board meeting every month.

Additional provisions in the agreement:

Town Administrator Ted Langill, whom the Select Board welcomed to the role at its August 17 meeting, said the agreement “is important in creating some stability with essential school funding while also taking accountable measures toward more fiscally responsible spending across town and our school district.” The Select Board also intends to pursue a similar agreement with the Board of Public Works.

The Select Board’s approval was not unanimous. At its August 17 meeting, the board voted 2-1 to adopt the MOU. Eric Kelley voted against it, arguing that the Town should not codify a revenue formula without first commissioning a comprehensive independent efficiency study. Chris Rohland, who voted in favor, said the document established a transparent forecasting baseline.

The agreement itself acknowledges limits. Its FAQ states plainly that the MOU “does not eliminate rising costs, limited revenue growth, capital needs, or difficult budget choices,” and that if the formula begins to squeeze public safety, DPW, facilities, or other essential services, the required forecasts and audits are meant to surface that pressure early rather than resolve it automatically. Enforcement is public rather than legal: the FAQ notes that if a party fails to follow the agreement, “the main accountability is public.”

Marshfield voters go to the polls Tuesday, September 1, from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on a $7 million Proposition 2½ operational override. Unlike a debt exclusion, which expires when a project is paid off, an operational override permanently raises the Town’s levy limit. Campaign materials list early voting at Marshfield Town Hall, 870 Moraine Street.

The question follows a spring in which the School Committee and Select Board publicly disagreed over how large an override to place before voters, with the School Committee seeking $7 million against a temporarily two member Select Board that had considered a smaller figure or none at all. Annual Town Meeting ultimately approved a budget built with roughly $5.6 million in spending above Proposition 2½ limits, and Town Meeting voted to send the $7 million question to the ballot.

Vote Yes for Marshfield’s Future, a campaign supporting the override, has been circulating a series of “myth versus fact” graphics in the final week. The committee’s claims, which South Shore News has not independently verified, include the following:

South Shore News did not receive comparable material from an organized opposition committee. The objection on the public record from an elected official remains Kelley’s: that the Town should complete an independent efficiency study before locking in a revenue formula.

For a Marshfield homeowner, Tuesday’s vote sets a permanent addition to the tax levy, and the MOU signed six days earlier sets the terms under which that money would be divided and accounted for. If the override passes, the schools’ share of net revenue is fixed at 68.5 percent rather than renegotiated each spring, and both boards are on record pledging not to return to voters with another operational override before 2031 absent a sharp inflation spike or a significant cut in state or federal aid. If it fails, the MOU’s forecasting and reporting requirements still take effect, but the override pledge, which is conditioned on passage, does not.

For residents who follow town finances, the practical change is access. Beginning this fall, Marshfield would publish revenue and expense forecasts three times a year, a five-year financial plan each September, monthly fiscal updates from the Town Administrator, departmental performance audits, and a joint budget presentation each February. Whether those documents arrive on schedule and prove useful is, by the agreement’s own account, the test of whether it works.

Polls are open Tuesday, September 1, from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. If the override passes, the five-year no-new-override pledge takes effect. Regardless of the outcome, the MOU’s reporting calendar begins this fall: five-year capital forecasts were due to the Capital Budget Committee by August 31, the first two-year revenue and expense forecast is due on or before September 30, and a joint meeting of the Select Board, School Committee, and Advisory Board is to be held between September 30 and October 15. The Select Board has also said it will work toward a similar agreement with the Board of Public Works. Marshfield’s Fall Special Town Meeting is scheduled for October 19.

Sept. 1, 2026Updated Sept. 2, 2026, 10:36 a.m. ET

Marshfield residents on Tuesday, Sept. 1, voted down a proposed $7 million property tax override.

Passing an override is a two-part process. The override budget must be approved at town meeting, and the funding mechanism for that budget must be approved at the ballot box.

Residents at a June 15 town meeting voted in support of a tax override, so the Tuesday vote was the final step in the process. The measure failed 4,801 to 4,059.

"The outcome of the override election today was a clear message that while the incredible nationwide challenges of affordability and inflation were not created here in Marshfield, it is our challenge to face locally and to tackle head on," Rick Smith, chair of the select board, posted on Facebook. "We can and we will do this in the only way we have the power to – through incredible fiscal restraint and discipline at the town level. While we do this, it is also vitally important that we remain compassionate and supportive to the dedicated public servants who have been impacted."

Without the override, the town faces a $7 million budget deficit. In May, about 70 educators were told their positions will be eliminated due to the schools' $4.5 million share of the deficit, said Benjamin Raymond, president of the Marshfield Education Association.

The select board voted 2-1 in support of allowing residents to decide on an override in an election. Member Eric Kelley said he was opposed to the override because the schools continue to add positions despite declining enrollment. He said a review of the school budget should happen before taxpayers are asked to increase taxes.

Town, school officials signed 5-year financial pact ahead of the vote

Town and school officials recently signed a memorandum of understanding that creates a school funding formula and financial reporting deadlines. The formula establishes a more predictable revenue-sharing framework for MarshfieldPublic Schools, allocating 68.5% of available revenue after accounting for shared costs.

Officials also committed to not seeking any additional operational override for at least five years except in casesof extreme inflation or a significant reduction in state or federal aid if residents approved the override Tuesday.

The select board approved the agreement Aug.17 in a 2-1 vote, and the school committee approved it unanimously Aug. 18.

"This agreement is intended to change the way we approach municipal finances," Smith said in a press release. "Fiscal discipline requires more than balancing a budget each year. It means planning further ahead, identifying financial pressures earlier, formalizing a plan to find operational efficiencies and cost savings, and improving the result through collaboration and partnership. This agreement represents the best of our town working together for a sustainable financial future which is what our residents expect and deserve."

Patriot Ledger reporter Jessica Trufant can be reached at jtrufant@patriotledger.com.

High School

Massachusetts High School Football Composite Rankings

Massachusetts 2026High School FootballComposite Rankings

Last update

Year 2026 ▾

Sport Football ▾

State Massachusetts ▾

Search

Rivals CompositeMassey Ranking

01Leader

Tabor AcademySeawolves · 0-0

Composite Score

81.645

Massey

539

MaxPreps

—

ESPN

—

SI

—

02Challenger

Catholic MemorialKnights · 0-0

Composite Score

80.702

Massey

749

MaxPreps

—

ESPN

—

SI

—

03Contender

St. John's Preparatory SchoolEagles · 0-0

Composite Score

80.420

Massey

808

MaxPreps

—

ESPN

—

SI

—

Load More